<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>World Climate Report</title>
	<link>http://www.worldclimatereport.com</link>
	<description>The Web's Longest-Running Climate Change Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Problem with Proxies</title>
		<link>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/30/the-problem-with-proxies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/30/the-problem-with-proxies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Droughts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Precipitation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/30/the-problem-with-proxies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a new paper (in press in the journal Geophysical Research Letters) that presents a lesson that we all should keep in mind—results based on reconstructions of climate phenomena that are based on once or twice removed “proxy” indicators, may not be as reliable as they appear (or as they are presented) to be. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/30/the-problem-with-proxies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Changing Influence of Time</title>
		<link>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/20/the-changing-influence-of-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/20/the-changing-influence-of-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Changes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/20/the-changing-influence-of-time/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since anyone first heard of global warming, we have been told that a warmer world would result in higher moisture levels in the atmosphere, and intensification of the hydrological cycle, and any number of negative consequences could result (e.g., more floods, more intense storms).  A warmer world would almost surely mean more evapotranspiration (ET) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/20/the-changing-influence-of-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Response to Skeptical Science&#8217;s “Patrick Michaels: Serial Deleter of Inconvenient Data”</title>
		<link>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/17/a-response-to-serial-deleter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/17/a-response-to-serial-deleter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/17/a-response-to-%e2%80%9c-patrick-michaels-serial-deleter-of-inconvenient-data%e2%80%9d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Patrick Michaels
When the battle is being lost, there is a tendency to try to raise a level of distraction to shift the attention away from the desperate situation at hand.  Such is the noise being raised concerning my presentation of the results from a recent series of scientific findings and observations—that lend further [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/17/a-response-to-serial-deleter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Replicated Global Warming Science Make Mann Go Ape?</title>
		<link>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/10/mann_go_ape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/10/mann_go_ape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Forcings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Models]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/10/replicating-science-long-term-observations-indicate-less-future-warming-and-the-wrath-of-mann/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 10 years ago, December 20, 2002 to be exact, we published a paper titled “Revised 21st century temperature projections”  in the journal Climate Research. We concluded: 
Temperature projections for the 21st century made in the Third Assessment Report (TAR) of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) indicate a rise of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/10/mann_go_ape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antarctic Temperature Trends</title>
		<link>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/03/antarctic-temperature-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/03/antarctic-temperature-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Changes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Polar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/03/antarctic-temperature-trends/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost exactly two three years ago, a prominent paper became a media darling as it, according to the alarmist website Real Climate “appeared to reverse the ‘Antarctic cooling’ meme that has been a staple of disinformation efforts for a while now.”
The Nature paper, by  Eric Steig and colleagues, made the cover on  the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2012/01/03/antarctic-temperature-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Winter 2011-12: Global Warming to Blame?</title>
		<link>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/12/21/winter-2011-12-global-warming-to-blame/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/12/21/winter-2011-12-global-warming-to-blame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Changes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Extremes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/12/21/winter-2011-12-global-warming-to-blame/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No matter what this winter holds in store, someone, somewhere, will blame it on global warming.
Recall that the last two snowy and cold winters in the eastern U.S. were blamed, by some, on greater than normal snowfall amounts across Eurasia during the preceding fall season. And the snowy Eurasian autumns were blamed on the low [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/12/21/winter-2011-12-global-warming-to-blame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Methane Time Bomb in Arctic Seas – Apocalypse Not”</title>
		<link>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/12/16/methane-time-bomb-in-arctic-seas-apocalypse-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/12/16/methane-time-bomb-in-arctic-seas-apocalypse-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Forcings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/12/16/%e2%80%9cmethane-time-bomb-in-arctic-seas-%e2%80%93-apocalypse-not%e2%80%9d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our headline is taken from New York Times blogger Andy Revkin&#8217;s recent DotEarth post covering the results of a new paper which investigates the relationship between higher temperatures in recent decades and methane release from the Arctic seabed off the Siberian coast.  As you can probably tell from the headline, the research team, led [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/12/16/methane-time-bomb-in-arctic-seas-apocalypse-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Picture Items</title>
		<link>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/12/14/big-picture-items/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/12/14/big-picture-items/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 22:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Changes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Paleo/Proxy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Temperature History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/12/14/big-picture-items/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Oftentimes, World Climate Report focuses on how elevated atmospheric levels of CO2 benefits various organisms or how observed changes in elements of climate in specific regions are not consistent with expectations from numerical climate model experiments.  We could almost feature an article on climate change and hurricanes every week—these kinds of articles are found [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/12/14/big-picture-items/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Huh? A Reply to Nathan Urban</title>
		<link>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/12/05/huh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/12/05/huh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Forcings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/12/05/huh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago,  we ran a story about a paper which was (then) soon to be published in Science magazine which generally concluded that the earth’s climate sensitivity (how much the earth’s average temperature will rise from a doubling of the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration) was likely lower than the IPCC’s best guess [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/12/05/huh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of Grapes</title>
		<link>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/11/21/the-future-of-grapes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/11/21/the-future-of-grapes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 19:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Adaptation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Plants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/11/21/the-future-of-grapes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A team of six scientists from Portugal began their article noting “According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the concentration of carbon dioxide [CO2] in the atmosphere has been increasing since pre-industrial times and is expected to exceed 550 ppm by the middle of the twenty-first century as a direct result of human activities, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/11/21/the-future-of-grapes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

